The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Have given the promotional wording a NPOV makeover. Am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources in the article or online. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Famous father, but
WP:NOTINHERITED applies here. Promotional article, created by a
WP:SPA.
Edwardx (
talk) 19:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep passes as there are clearly reputable, notable and reliable sources in the article from The Wall Street Journal, Billboard, Variety, ESPN and others. A basic web search sees an article on subject from Marketwatch today. Subject seems easily noteworthy and renown separate from family ties. GaryFromGary (
talk) 13:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - after removing the spam, trivia, unsourced matters, BLP violations, and nonsense, I could determine that he's probably notable. If I were still an admin, I would consider long-term monitoring or protection.
Bearian (
talk) 01:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I looked at the given references. Where is Doug significantly covered by an independent, reliable source?
Dial911 (
talk) 02:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - Certainly notable given accomplishments referenced in article, even moreso given current independant news stories on political album just release he apparently produced.
ChocolateBabkaGirl (
talk) 12:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - Editor who flagged edits primarily billionaires. While Doug is not apparently billionaire, he is obviously notable given sourcing.
KnittingQueenKY (
talk) 12:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.