- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Double Nickels (film)
- Double Nickels (film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A nothing film. Not a single review I can find at Rotten Tomatoes. Cast, director, generally not notable. Bbb23 ( talk) 20:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 23:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The best so far I can bring to the table is
-
Variety's Film Reviews: 1975–1977. Variety's Film Reviews Series. Bowker. 1989.
ISBN
978-0-8352-2794-0. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
More empty calories for junk-film fans; cheap but tasty. ... Jack Vacek Ed Ed Abrams Jordan Patrice Schubert George George Cole Tami Heidi Schubert ... Though it may not please the fender-benders. Jack Vacek shows a genius here for getting his characters out of the expensive cars and into the cheap cars just before the smashup. If nothing else, that takes more plot development than these oilers usually have. Trying to judge the commercial prospects of a film like "Double Nickels" is like weighing the nutritional value of a Twinkie.
-
Variety's Film Reviews: 1975–1977. Variety's Film Reviews Series. Bowker. 1989.
ISBN
978-0-8352-2794-0. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
- The review in Variety is longer, but the above is what I'm able to extract from snippet view. So we are a fathom or two away from WP:NFILM. I'm willing to change my mind if something more substantial can be found. Sam Sailor 23:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix ( talk) 19:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix ( talk) 19:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep a "low-budget" film that's apparently awful, but [1] a well as Sam's link is enough for it to meet the (generally very low) bar for film notability, IMO. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 18:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as per power~enwiki, with these references, just scrapes in as notable. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 01:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.