The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Dominic J. Arcuri

Dominic J. Arcuri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator contested PROD. This is a civil servant/security official who does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NPOL, or WPNAUTHOR. The excessive extternal links as well as links to blurb descriptions of his books raise promotional concerns as well. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Article reads like a resume. Was created by an account calling itself Zetagroupusa. Zeta Group USA is in the business of providing "custom training programs for commissioned police services and security agencies in the developing nations of the world," which seems to be what Dominic Arcuri has spent his career doing. I believe there is likely a conflict of interest issue here. I am unable to find evidence of notability for Dominic Arcuri, and I would advise other people conducting before research to not google "Dominic Arcuri "Zeta Group"" unless they want a bunch of porn to come up. ~ ONUnicorn^{( Talk| Contribs)} problem solving 21:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete poorly sourced, paltry PROMO. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 22:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete vanity page for a footnote individual. RudyLucius ( talk) 19:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:ANYBIO. Does not otherwise meet WP:GNG. Likely WP:PROMO -- Jack Frost ( talk) 11:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - No significant. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.