- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Doctor Mew
- Doctor Mew ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell, we don't do articles based on fan art with minimal coverage. Much of this can be merged into the artist's article. -- Alex TW 07:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 08:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete According to Jenny Parks this is the piece she's best known for. That article has a lot of problems too. I support deleting both both, and all the other articles like Catvengers and Star Trek Cats that we're going to see about (God forbid) every other cat piece she makes that gets featured on catster and neatorama.com Delete as promotional. Mduvekot ( talk) 23:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Merge As with all the other cat painting articles, into Jenny Parks. They are all an epic fail of WP:SUSTAINED and WP:BOMBARDMENT, including her article itself. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 10:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 19:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment, none of the above editors have addressed whether the citations in the "Reception" section are
useable for
notability (i suspect not), "well why don't you coola?" yes i could but my cat bias (i luv dogs too:)) might show, plus its doctor who!
Coolabahapple (
talk) 19:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC) - Delete or Merge Normally coverage on the Pets Lady blog clinches it for me. (Not.) I find this article to be more of an advertisement for a single, silly, work done by an artist than a good encyclopedia article. The coverage is there but if this were about a person we would say that it all centers around one event. 104.163.148.25 ( talk) 03:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.