From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 17:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Discovery Gardens

Discovery Gardens (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no references except property listings on real estate guides, and advertisements DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Judging by the sources, it is not a genuine neighborhood ,but a property development constructed by a single firm,It is one of the biggest and most popular master communities of property developer Nakheel, (ref 5),; that's the reason I Iisted it here. DGG ( talk ) 06:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
    • Note that it is a genuine area in Dubai, on maps (e.g., see Google maps) and with its own Metro station. It is the nature of Dubai that whole neighbourhoods are developed by large companies there. — Jonathan Bowen ( talk) 12:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 12:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Comment – note that the area features in a novel and other books (added as references). — Jonathan Bowen ( talk) 12:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – note that I have now added historical context to the article, with references. I think the WP:ATD, WP:NEXIST, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:NOTCLEANUP policies apply in the case of this artlcle. — Jonathan Bowen ( talk) 14:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Article has been significantly expanded since the deletion nomination and doesn't come across as an advertisement. Referencing appears to be sufficient. NemesisAT ( talk) 16:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.