The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 22:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not qualify under
WP:BAND or
WP:GNG. No indication that it has charted on anything other than mp3.com, which does not qualify under
WP:CHARTS.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 20:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Edited to add:Also, obvious vanity article by SPA with same account name as the band.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 16:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 23:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
B E C K Y S A Y L E S 01:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as Eggishorn covered.
Cylon B (
talk) 01:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- not a repository of fan pages, which this article is.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 06:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.