The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of notability in the article. A search turns up no in-depth mentions in reliable, independent sources. Consequently, fails
WP:NBIO, and also fails to pass
WP:NPOL as the subject has not held any office.
AryKun (
talk) 05:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per nominator. The subject is some party bureaucrat, and I could only find passing mentions in reliable secondary sources. -
Tristan Surtel (
talk) 11:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Being a member of a political party's organizing committee is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia irrespective of his sourceability or lack thereof, but the sourcing here is 5/7
primary sources that are not support for notability at all and 2/7 glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage that isn't about him. That's not how you get a person over
WP:GNG.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. This could well be speedy
WP:G11'd. I don't see a notable individual being covered by sources here, and the article feels more like an advertisement about the individual than an encyclopedia entry. Otherwise, the individual clearly fails
WP:NPOL and doesn't appear to meet
WP:BASIC, from my search of sources. —
Mikehawk10 (
talk) 04:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.