The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 12:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)reply
He is noted Indian entrepreneur.
I added reliable sources.
If you feel something like promotion then we can remove that things.
But The Article should not be deleted.
Virenderthind2019 (
talk) 10:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Must not be deleted If we find an article written in a promotional tone, we should correct it instead of deleting it.
According to sources, he is noted. That is what matters. Main thing, now I have improved the article. Now there is nothing like promotion.
Virenderthind2019 (
talk) 12:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
I think he is not notable current time and only references are not enough for notability. --
Raju Jangid (
talk) 16:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply
If only references are not enough for notability So please tell me what things are enough for notability?
Delete: A publicity operative whose company has no article, so cannot provide a redirect target. Notability is
WP:NOTINHERITED from doing commissioned work for celebrities (e.g. The Hindu article) and the other sources are the kinds of puff-pieces inherent in the subject's field. I see nothing which establishes encyclopaedic notability.
AllyD (
talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.