The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ per WP:CSD#G7. The nominator is the page creator; there are no substantial content edits by others; and there have been no other !votes calling for a different outcome. If desired, undeletion may be requested at WP:REFUND. ^Complex/ _Rational 19:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Deugro

Deugro (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So I created this page back in 2019, thinking that this company, being big, should have a WP page. However, since then, it has been tagged for notability issues. It might be best to remove it, as if a German company doesn't have an article on German WP, it likely isn't worth having on English WP at all. Others might perceive it as a paid article, which it is not. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Germany. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• I think this can be speedied under G7. The only edits from other people are some minor cleanup. Might do an actual comment later if I don't miss it though. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 15:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.