The result was Delete. I would have closed as a merge and redirect, but Dhartung correctly points out that all sourced, verifiable information on the topic is already covered at Desinicization campaign. Walton One 14:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC) reply
I was drawn to the desinicization campaign article because its long term edit war by new and unregistered users kept showing up at WikiRage.com. After reviewing the matter with others, it was concluded that the edit war largely was because the article was composed of original research, unreferenced, POV material. I protected the article, rewrote the article using only reliable source material, and post that material to the article. The purpose was to get that edit war under control and make the disputes around that topic manageable by others. A new editor's post of the old version was redirected back to Desinicization campaign. Desinicize is a POV content fork using the old, unreferenced version that generated the edit war. Desinicize should be deleted. -- Jreferee ( Talk) 14:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC) reply