- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Debra Medina
AfDs for this article:
- Debra Medina ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable state-level politician, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Medina has run for state office twice, losing both times. According to the article, she has never held public office. Her only other claim to notability is a minor controversy regarding a statement she made on Glenn Beck's show, which she quickly retracted. Note: The previous deletion nomination for this article name was for a disambiguation page, and not for Medina's article itself. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom; I don't see any claim to notability other than losing in Republican primaries. Power~enwiki ( talk) 07:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The only discernible claim of notability here is being a non-winning candidate in party primaries, which is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but the referencing is 9/13 dependent on primary sources rather than reliable ones — and of the four citations that are to reliable sources, one of them is an unnecessary reduplication of one of the other three. But three reliable sources isn't enough reliable sources to make a person notable just for being a non-winning candidate for political office, because every non-winning candidate for political office could always show three pieces of media coverage. Bearcat ( talk) 22:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per first editor and nom, small level politician.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 13:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.