The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep notable professional awardee, no policy based reason for deletion. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
166.143.154.162 (
talk) 21:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Policy is mentioned. Received a non-notable award from a charity no longer in existence. —
kashmīrīTALK 21:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Non-notable (but there's more than just one award and the ALA award--which still exists--is definitely notable) would be one thing but no longer in existence isn't an argument against notability per
WP:NTEMP.
Skynxnex (
talk) 15:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep notable author and librarian, has sufficient sourcing to meet
WP:GNG. Andre🚐 02:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Evidence is already in the article as it exists. Your rationale is invalid. The references are not mostly sources closely associated with the subject. Andre🚐 14:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Multiple publications which have been subject of a scholarly review.
Gusfriend (
talk) 10:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Meets
WP:AUTHOR with multiple, independent reviews of her work. Also, to be clear, she was an associate librarian of the United States'
Library of Congress, which is the library for the
United States Congress, not a small/local library.
DaffodilOcean (
talk) 11:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Meets
WP:AUTHOR as stated. Marcum was president of
Council on Library and Information Resources for eight years and a university dean for three years. Google Scholar shows her scholarship has been cited hundreds of times by other academics, and she received the American Library Association's highest honor in addition to the Miles Conrad Award (which continues to be awarded as of this year), so meets
WP:PROF.
Topshelver (
talk) 12:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. I don't think her citations are enough for
WP:PROF#C1 but the major awards look like a pass of #C2 and heading the CLIR could pass #C6. Published profiles give in-depth independent coverage for
WP:GNG, and multiple published reviews of multiple books pass
WP:AUTHOR. This is one of a number of AfDs on clearly-notable biographies initiated by
User:Kashmiri in an apparent case of
WP:HOUNDING against long-term editor
User:Rlhuffine. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 18:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Another personal attack by someone who supposedly is an administrator. @
David Eppstein, it's only for lack of time that I'm not taking your incessant attacks to ANI. —
kashmīrīTALK 21:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Negative evaluations of patterns of contributions are not the same thing as personal attacks. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 22:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
With this level of understanding of Wikipedia policies (here:
WP:HOUNDING), shouldn't you consider a voluntary recall?
(This is just an evaluation of your pattern of reasoning). —
kashmīrīTALK 16:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I do not think "evaluation" means what you think it means. There is no evaluation in your comment, only innuendo. I note that this is not the first time you have been accused of hounding,
this month alone. In both cases you explicitly admitted to looking through contribution lists to find other edits to work against. That may be appropriate behavior in response to new or low-quality editors but not with long-term good-faith editors with whom you merely have a difference of opinion. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Article shows awards and significant positions in her field. I count > 50 publications by her. The citation counts are not high, but I think they may be comparable for the field which, oddly enough, does not produce much writing.
Lamona (
talk) 05:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per above; an impressive amount of work and significant in her field with some extension into popular culture, plus the awards and reviews of her books.
Skynxnex (
talk) 15:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.