The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 22:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Following
BLPN discussion, this article should be deleted as a violation of
WP:BLPCRIME. The subject has not yet been convicted of any such crime
[1], article admits as much, instead only charged at the moment. The article cannot be salvaged currently, so I don't think anything less than deletion will resolve the issue. I've no issue with recreation if the subject ends up convicted.
ProcrastinatingReader (
talk) 18:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Multiple BLPCRIME violations with only claim to notability being not yet proven allegations.
• Gene93k (
talk) 19:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Additional comment: This person is currently standing trial. That only compounds the BLP problem. This article should not exist.
• Gene93k (
talk) 20:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: No claims to notability outside of what they are accused of, clear violation of
BLPCRIME. --J04n(
talk page) 13:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.