- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Dean Lee Hansen
- Dean Lee Hansen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability, see criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. – Fayenatic L ondon 14:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing more than a curriculum. Victão Lopes Fala! 20:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF. The economists are quite thorough about ranking each other and apparently he doesn't even make the top 25% in Brazil [1], so WP:PROF#C1 seems unlikely. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.