The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The organisation is non-notable. The editor who created the article admits that "very little has been written about it." Google news [1] has exactly zero coverage. The article appears promotional, is written from a religious POV and unverifiable claims are made. Smcg8374 ( talk) 01:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The faith-based philosophy section was edited to remove bias, stating religious assumptions as existing from the ministry's POV. Regarding the question of significance: if significance is only measured based on online and print citations, then yes, this camp is insignificant. I would argue that based on its length of operation, number of campers served, etc, that it is significant even though it has a nonexistent web presence. What kind of sources are necessary to prove significance? Typative ( talk) 3:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)