The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 21:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
There is no claim of notability for this photographer.
Irbisgreif (
talk) 22:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - the only non-trivial mention is a
single paragraph in the New York Times, which has insufficient depth to show notability.
Kevin (
talk) 22:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per Kevin Chzz ► 04:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete - In addition to the NY Times, I found
[1], and
[2] which hint at possible notability. But without anything more substantial, this isn't enough to establish notability. -
Whpq (
talk) 14:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.