From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 09:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC) reply

David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism

David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a very good book, but it fails all five criteria at WP:BKCRIT and is not notable enough to deserve a Wikipedia article.  White Whirlwind   咨  06:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 20:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (chew) @ 20:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (chatter) @ 20:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It took some serious digging, but I eventually found gold in them thar hills. I've found some reviews and an article or two, so it should pass notability guidelines now. It definitely needs some work by someone familiar with the book to flesh it out, but notability shouldn't be an issue now. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as above. There is independent media coverage of this book and online library sources are saying people are reading / checking out this work from actual physical libraries. It is not self-published promo. - Augustabreeze ( talk) 18:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep -- There is clearly sufficient thrid party coverage. Peterkingiron ( talk) 12:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.