The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Roostery123 both of those links are dead. Where did you find the articles please? Can you link me?
MaxnaCarta (
talk) 02:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Roost The first one is definitely about him. The IHT one is a discussion that he took place in, so it's not a secondary source. Is the Barron's really only two lines, or am I not able to see the rest?
Lamona (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 00:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I not convinced he is notable. There is lots of primary coverage him talking, but its all passing mentions. I've not seen
WP:THREEWP:SECONDARY sources that prove he is notable. Lots of these references seems to be dead and
WP:BEFORE doesn't turn up much either. I do know his fund is closed. Fails
WP:SIGCOV,
WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 08:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.