From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 00:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply

David Berguer

David Berguer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable author. None of his books are in more than 20 worldcat libraries, and I cannot locate an significant reviews. DGG ( talk ) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy Keep Not sure how the nominator missed the library holdings at World Cat but here they are:
All over by Christmas is in University of Oxford, Trinity College Library Dublin, National Library of Scotland.
The Friern Hospital story is in six major libraries including the above and the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda.
Under the Wires at Tally Ho is in twenty libraries!
British Library holdings of this author:
http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01016660842
http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01015664084
http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01016222183
Press coverage:
http://www.times-series.co.uk/leisure/books/10049434._Not_treated__but_not_ill_treated_/
http://www.times-series.co.uk/leisure/books/11107188.Barnet_in_the_Great_War/
His award is in Transactions of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society, currently behind a paywall as too recent to be freely available. As the nomination appears to be based on an error, it would be gracious of @ DGG: to now withdraw it. Philafrenzy ( talk) 08:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy Keep As Philafrenzy demonstrates in some detail, the stated basis for the nomination is not valid. Edwardx ( talk) 09:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy Keep as per Edwardx. We have too few articles on municipal historians and Berguer's books are in several reputable libraries. No Swan So Fine ( talk) 15:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Philafrenzy. I would close per WP:SNOW but requesting a withdrawal is nicer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.