The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Ks0stm(
T•
C•
G•
E) 00:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
non notable author. None of his books are in more than 20 worldcat libraries, and I cannot locate an significant reviews. DGG (
talk ) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep As
Philafrenzy demonstrates in some detail, the stated basis for the nomination is not valid.
Edwardx (
talk) 09:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep as per Edwardx. We have too few articles on municipal historians and Berguer's books are in several reputable libraries.
No Swan So Fine (
talk) 15:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per Philafrenzy. I would close per
WP:SNOW but requesting a withdrawal is nicer.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 12:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.