The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep = singer for two notable bands.
Bearian (
talk) 02:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The wording is "a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." Prominence would imply meeting GNG. This subject does not.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 06:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Just because you are not familiar with the subject it does not mean that it should be removed. –
Sabbatino (
talk) 07:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)reply
It's not about my knowledge, but complete lack of sources on the subject. In other words, jut because you can't find sources for the subject doesn't mean we should keep it. I trust that the closing admin will see the complete lack of argument on your part.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 14:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I understand it's a good faith nomination. However,
WP:NMUSIC#6 is not interpreted the way you believe it is. Prominence absolutely does not imply GNG. See the note provided in NMUSIC#6 to understand what is prominence. To be a choir singer: 'not prominent'. To be a lead singer: 'prominent'. As already mentioned by Bearian, Ingram has been a prominent member of two notable bands. I haven't ever met him but can say his prominence comes out clearly in the coverage he has received in the sources belonging to the genre he sings in. You might consider withdrawing the nomination for now. Thanks.
Lourdes 16:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.