- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury under criterion A7. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 00:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Datestamps on receipts in Canada
- Datestamps on receipts in Canada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a collection of facts. WP:NOT. Does not have enough coverage in reliable sources to verify and sustain an article. Does not pass WP:GNG. Jbh Talk 01:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a collection of trivial facts collected as a hobby. Ok, that is not actually a Wikipedia AfD essay but it should be for this article.-- Rpclod ( talk) 03:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as indiscriminate info, and perhaps a good choice for invoking WP:BEANS: even if not explicitly covered, this is what any good encyclopedia should not be. WP:ISNOTALISTOFDATESTAMPFORMATSONCANADIANRECEIPTS. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 06:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - WP:A7, no indication of why this collection of info about companies listed by datestamp has any notability whatsoever —Мандичка YO 😜 08:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.