The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Draftify (giving it the benefit of the doubt; otherwise delete) This really needs to go back to the draft space, it's nowhere near ready to be published. The text is pretty much incomprehensible, and because of that, and the fact that there are only a couple of wikilinks (and they are to disambiguation pages), it's difficult to even understand quite what the topic is. That would also give a chance to address verifiability: I realise sources don't need to be online, but the way they are currently 'cited' leaves this IMO effectively unreferenced, hence (for now at least) it fails
WP:V and consequently
WP:GNG. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 12:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Article"Darmi khan"is very informative and contain correct information about swat and darmi khan.Please do not delete this article.thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
39.60.12.12 (
talk) 13:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Draftify For necessary improvements per DoubleGrazing.
desmay (
talk) 18:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Article does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NBIO. I think it will just die a slow death in drafts. //
Timothy :: talk 14:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
at best draftify the article has a link to
Swat (a dab page), probably referring either to
Swat (princely state) or
Swat District, but neither seems to refer to this individual or show that he was significant. He does not seem to be a ruler of the state (who would be notable). We have a long genealogy (s/o is son of) involving ancestors who are apparently NN; and conflicts which I do not identify in the other articles referred to. I have to conclude for the moment that the article is
WP:OR relating to a
WP:NN person.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.