From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Daria Schirman

Daria Schirman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. XXN, 20:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in the hope that someone will be able to improve this. I struggled in writing Vera Danchakoff and I confirm what K.e.coffman says. In these situations verifiability is more important that what we unfortunately call "notability". Thincat ( talk) 10:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 20:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.