The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Daniel (
talk) 07:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
This was deleted under the title of
Danny Duncan (YouTube personality), by the time I wrote that article I thought it would pass
WP:GNG but now someone has changed a redirect page to a whole new article, the references are just YouTube videos of himself.
Mjbmr (
talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: I have improved the article somewhat and found plenty of other sources. I am just surprised that above editor "Barely found anything about him," Google news returns more info about him, including VICE and Variety. I am reserving my vote for now, until I do a little more research.
Expertwikiguy (
talk) 11:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Just being mentioned is not enough. There have to be at least 3 independent reliable sources with articles fully dedicated to the subject and talking about him in detail. The fact that he blew up his car or gifted one to a random girl is not the kind of coverage needed to pass
WP:GNG.
Less Unless (
talk) 18:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete As mentioned previously, I haven't been able to find any
WP:RS. Danny Duncan doesn't seem to meet.
Redoryxx (
talk) 19:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete despite the sources being some big names, the actual content itself is just crufty garbage and quoting him about his love of being a virgin, so blp1e at best.
CUPIDICAE💕 21:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.