Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Danish_(journalist) References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Danish (journalist)

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't know his dob and last name. No significant coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NJOURNALIST. Störm (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 09:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 09:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 09:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 09:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 09:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete just being a journalist does not make someone notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete no in depth coverage in the RS. -- Saqib ( talk) 08:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Comment the existing referencing is atrocious, but better references exist ( [1] [2] [3]). I'm not convinced they're enough to keep this, though. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Two former sources are not reliable enough, and the latter one is not independent of the subject. -- Saqib ( talk) 04:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.