From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Danielle Jadelyn

Danielle Jadelyn (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to fit notability criteria. No references to back up notability. Makro ( talk) 13:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
She has only been in one film which I do not think merits notability. Makro ( talk) 16:36, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for actresses. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, apparently entirely non-notable. Even her husband, who seems to have written much of the article, hasn't been able to show why we should have a page about her. Playing an unnamed bit part in a couple of episodes of a TV serial does not come anywhere near fulfilling WP:NACTOR. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I searched for her Hebrew name in Google News and found several more sources which I've added to the article. She appears to be regularly reported upon in Hebrew, though her movie JeruZalem has also received plenty of coverage in English. Based on the current sourcing of the article, she passes WP:GNG for significant coverage in independent, secondary sources. She also appeared as a named role (Katie the Water Bottle Girl) in two episodes of Skins (UK TV series), she appeared on the Israeli show Prime Minister's Children, and she was the leading role in the 2015 movie JeruZalem. She also produced and directed Folie à Trois which received critical acclaim in Israel. As a result, I think she also passes WP:ENTERTAINER for "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Lonehexagon ( talk) 00:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep has the lead role in the movie JeruZalem which was shown in many different contries, got several awards etc. As well as other notable roles in television and film. I think she is notable as an entertainer. -- Dynara23 ( talk) 10:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The JeruZalem is cheap horror film, that are usually populated with young girls, in this case Jadelyn, with a third co-star slot, which is an early stage career move. most actors go through the horror film stage, as they are always looking for new faces to be murdered in the most horrorful way. The rest are bit parts, shorts, character actor parts, all indicative of an actor, who is still trying to make it. There is zero evidence of awards, and the article certainly does not pass the WP:ENTERTAINER policy. Looking at that specific policy: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. I dont see that, it is not valid. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. There indication of this. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. I severly doubt that somebody so early in her career is notable All the evidence indicates that she in non notable, and is perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep ( talk) 10:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles ( talk) 02:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.