The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - the 2017 piece in the
Hamilton Spectator that is already referenced in the article is significant. And here's another from
2020.
Nfitz (
talk) 16:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The coverage in The Spec is significant, but
WP:GNG states Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. We would need two more examples of significant coverage from different organizations to meet the requirement.
BilledMammal (
talk) 02:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete There is nothing to show he is unusually notable for a boxing promoter. Of course he's mentioned in articles on events he's promoting, but that's not significant independent coverage. As BilledMammal mentions, multiple mentions in the Hamilton Spectator, even if you believe they're significant coverage, only count as one source. Two previous deletions do not strengthen the case for notability.
Papaursa (
talk) 03:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete the indepedent sources from each other point in the GNG formula is not met enough to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 21:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show he passes
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 16:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Not seeing the sources. Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of sigcov in multiple RS.
Dennis Brown -
2¢ 20:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.