- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Only one person is asserting that GNG and related guidelines are met, the others don't agree. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 07:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Dan Hilton
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dan Hilton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a political strategist who has never held any role that confers an automatic free pass of WP:NPOL just because he exists, but is not reliably sourced well enough to clear WP:GNG. Holding a role within a political party's internal organizational structure can get a person into Wikipedia if they're well-sourced as the subject of coverage about their work in that role, but every single link listed under either "references" or "external links" is one of three things: a primary source that does not constitute support for notability at all, a brief glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about somebody else, or a source that just soundbites his personal advice on basic career planning strategies. As well, the article has been flagged for notability and sourcing issues since 2010 without seeing significant improvement. Not even one of these references is substantively about him for the purposes of getting him over GNG, but the role he held is not so "inherently" notable as to exempt him from actually having to pass GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 16:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NPOL Lubbad85 ( ☎) 01:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep it passes WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG (especially if one considers the external links) and therefore its irrelevant whether or not it meets WP:NPOL. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 18:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO - Epinoia ( talk) 00:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. As a side note, the text has been created by a kamikaze account and then amplified by another one. Election time is AfD overtime. - The Gnome ( talk) 17:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.