The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
SoWhy 10:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete the fact one of the two sources is titled "Rare & Obscure Music" says it all.
SportingFlyer (
talk) 06:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
That's the nature of stubs isn't it, the stub tag says please improve not please AfDIn ictu oculi (
talk) 11:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
It's not worth improving if the subject isn't notable. The new sources don't show notability either.
SportingFlyer (
talk) 20:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep added more sources including Billboard album review, + charting song in Joel Whitburn Presents Billboard Top Adult Songs, 1961-2006: Chart Data Compiled from Billboard's Adult Contemporary Charts, 1961-2006, and Adult Top 40 Charts, 1996-2006
In ictu oculi (
talk) 11:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. I'm an inclusionist, but being merely mentioned on a list or chart does not make one notable. Notability for people means, "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." (
WP:BIO). I don't see anything close to evidence of that. --
В²C☎ 22:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.