The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 06:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Daisy Jing

Daisy Jing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing coverage that adds up to WP:GNG. Across the provided sources, I see a fair amount of non-independent coverage but nothing that is both independent and significant. Searching online returned more of the same, Jing seems to have a propensity for garnering mentions in "X habits of successful entrepreneur" clickbait articles. It may be easier to establish a case for notability for her company, Banish. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Java Hurricane 07:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete a non-notable businesswoman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, per nom. does not meet WP:GNG. Alex-h ( talk) 09:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.