The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 06:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Dairyland Farm World

Dairyland Farm World (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see any coverage beyond local newspapers or basic listings in directories of tourist locations, so can't see that this would meet any reasonable level of notability. _nonsense ferret 00:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete: There is a reference to BBC coverage, but there isn't much more to be found independently. Note that the article itself links to " The Big Sheep," which is going to fail if this fails. The article text provides no substantial claim to notability and nearly does the reverse. I would never want to see more promotion in an article, but this one makes it sound like a farm-saving opening up of the facility. Hithladaeus ( talk) 12:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

I agree with that, and worth making the point that the BBC coverage is from the local BBC Cornwall - which is very limited in scope and thus does not evidence interest outside of the local area. -- _nonsense ferret 12:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Unfortunately delete (and maybe draft) because although there is coverage as shown here, here, here and here, there's not much significant. SwisterTwister talk 17:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Nothing to show that Dairyland Farm World or The Big Sheep are anything more than reasonably popular local tourist attractions. I think both WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:ORGDEPTH apply and would favor deleting these two articles. Bordwall( ^talk⁄ _ctrb) 18:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.