- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. There were concerns, which have been dealt with, and that's all I can really say about that. Primefac ( talk) 21:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Daeco Andrian
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Daeco Andrian ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- speedy delete a7/g11. This fails every single criteria and doesn't need to go through AFD. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete A7, as done already a few times today.-- Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 14:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment why is the speedy an emergency? I cannot see the article since it seems to have been deleted with alacrity. Lightburst ( talk) 15:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- (Question: How was this page deleted a second time without the deletion appearing in the logs?) – Thjarkur (talk) 20:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Þjarkur It was oversighted for reasons that should be obvious given you saw it in the abuse log, which you should also remove the link to. Praxidicae ( talk) 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.