The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 12:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Like the nom, I'm not able to find significant coverage of the company by multiple
WP:ORGIND reliable sources. The sources currently in the article consist of non-independent blog posts (including pages from D#'s website) and an extremely brief mention in a
"year in review" publication of a university police force. I can't find
Source #4, but
neither can the internet archive, and even if it were a single independent RS that gives SIGCOV, that isn't enough to make a company notable. As such, this should be deleted for failing to meet the relevant notability guideline in line with
WP:DEL-REASON#8. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 03:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete As per the analysis above, I am unable to locate anything better, references fail NCORP's criteria for establishing notability.
HighKing++ 17:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.