From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cullen Large

Cullen Large (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply

A very easy keep. This biography clears GNG and NSPORTS by more than a lot of sports bios I've seen here. There is WP:SIGCOV in The Province, Baseball America, and Sportsnet, all of which are WP:SIRS. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 01:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Note that Sportsnet is owned by Rogers Communications, which also owns the Toronto Blue Jays, the organization that had Large at the time that article was written. Let'srun ( talk) 15:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: The subject meets WP:GNG with WP:SIGCOV from multiple reliable sources. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 04:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete I created this article as a redirect to Toronto Blue Jays minor league players, but I don't think Large is notable enough for a standalone article. The Baseball America reference is a general stat page that all minor league prospects have. In my opinion we only have 2 refs contributing towards notability in terms of SIGCOV (The Province & Sportsnet). If more SIGCOV is found I do think that the article should probably be kept. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 14:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply
    The Baseball America link is an article, not a stats page. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 16:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: This subject meets the WP:GNG because of independent WP:SIGCOV from Baseball America and The Province, which each provides in-depth coverage of the subject. Let'srun ( talk) 15:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete never made the majors, coverage is sparse and routine. Non-notable minor league baseball player. SportingFlyer T· C 02:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 20:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply