The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy/snowball keep. The notability of geographic places is well established.--
chaser -
t 16:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
step 3). It is listed now.
DumbBOT (
talk) 11:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep The major map services show it as a placemark, and unincorporation is not a guidline to deletion of a community article. Nate•(
chatter) 11:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep The sources might be misplaced, but the external links are valid sources and clearly show this is a real inhabited place, which are commonly considered notable as long as they're verifiable. -
Mgm|
(talk) 11:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep as a real geographical location. -
Dravecky (
talk) 14:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep Per precedent, even an unincorporated community does not fail WP:N.
Mandsford (
talk) 15:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.