From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Cross International

Cross International (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A charity with ??? notability. Generic name impedes the search for sources, leading to red herrings and other organizations that don't seem to be related to this one. The original article author (circa 2009) clearly SPA, also redirected their user name to this article for some reason? Pretty sure this was made as advertising, and there hasn't been enough interest or sourcing to actually improve it over the years. If anyone has some practical advice to improve this article, I'd be happy to fix it up, but if TNT is required, I ought to call in the pros. Estheim ( talk) 10:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I cannot tell whether or not this is notable. It claims to have 46 projects in 12 countries, which might be sufficient to make it notable. On the other hand, there are no outgoing links and the organisation's website is very non-specific as to what it is doing. I would be much happier if there were an indication of turnover or something like that to demonstrate its size. If large, it probably would be notable. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. This is a legitimate international charity, not a commercial/spam operation. Just look at their YouTube channel and their excellent Charity Navigator and BBB ratings. The Wikidata page's Identifiers has more useful info. Cordially, History DMZ ( HQ) ( wire) 17:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 02:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ( talkcontribs) 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.