The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Creative Thinkers International

Creative Thinkers International (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and inadequate reliable sources. Also appears to be self-promotional Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• What about merging into the creator's article? Candleabracadabra ( talk) 00:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 01:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:53, 14 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete fails WP:ORG. primary sources provided with no evidence of significant third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 02:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.