The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus against deletion. –
czar 19:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - per the sources found by
The1337gamer. This nominations seems like a failure of
WP:BEFORE. As Metacritic shows, the subject was even featured in hard copy, print Magazines, not to mention the ones easily found online, like
IGN. I'm honestly not sure what's worse, the sloppy effort gone into writing this article, or the research done in seeing if it should be nominated for deletion. We do have to keep in mind that we should not mistake the former as an excuse for the latter...
Sergecross73msg me 14:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. It's not World of Warcraft, but it's got a few reviews in reliable sources.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 06:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - As much as I hate the little shit the game does unfortunately have a few sources, Sure they're not brilliant but meh I'd say they're sufficient enough. –
Davey2010Talk 01:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.