The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article fails to establish notability. The only thing it has is a trivial, hyperfocused listicle that has no real worth.
TTN (
talk) 00:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge as above. The listicle is something, but not enough alone. I came across
this, but it's probably not reliable. If I could be convinced it was, I think it might be in the "weak keep" category.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 09:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge as above. Article consists entirely of the appearance of crawling claws in DnD games, so a separate article is not necessary.
JIP |
Talk 11:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect Its claim to notability is that it is one of the weakest D&D monsters? Not really much to say about it then, is there? –
sgeurekat•
c 05:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.