- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Craig Hanna
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Craig Hanna ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Re-nominating, since previous AfD have been subject to bad faith manipulation by Sanketio31. 1st AfD in 2019 resulted in delete, and I don't see any change in terms of notability. It was then recreated and Sanketio31 created a 2nd AfD which was nominated, voted keep, and closed all by their sockpuppets. This 2nd AfD resulted in a premature closure of the 3rd AfD. Please, ignore 2nd (fraudulent) and 3rd (misled) AfDs. MarioGom ( talk) 19:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MarioGom ( talk) 19:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Per MarioGom's rationale, furthermore this has 0 encyclopedic value, sources optimized aren’t even necessary about him, other material I could find do not meet WP:SIGCOV as they mention him in passing/announcements. Celestina007 ( talk) 00:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, and thank you to MarioGom for bringing this forward. The article from the Los Angeles Times is good coverage, but the NYT, Hollywood Reporter, and LA Business Journal articles just quote Hanna without providing significant coverage. My online search does not turn up any other sources that would establish notability. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 06:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete NO RS that features him here to indicate notability of this article content, some RS but just side mentions. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 07:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per before AfDs and passing GNG criteria. Subject has indepth coverage in
Los Angeles Times and can see coverage on other reputed sources too like
NYTimes,
The Hollywood Reporter, etc. It should pass for
WP:BASIC.
Girthab (
talk)
04:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- — Note to closing admin: Girthab ( talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 05:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.