The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 04:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Costa Del Mar

Costa Del Mar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NCORP Lyndaship ( talk) 15:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment - The company seems to have been involved in a series of lawsuits for fraudulent practices. I've added this to the article. London Hall ( talk) 18:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  samee   converse  20:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  samee   converse  20:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment - I found a press release: https://www.hometownnewsvolusia.com/news/plans-approved-for-new-costa-del-mar-headquarters/article_16eb2bc0-369c-11e8-83bd-b70c483f4466.html

Another one: https://invisionmag.com/news/press-releases/3850-costa-launches-onecoast-campaign-for-disaster-relief.html Gidev the Dood ^(Talk) 18:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep - I gave the article a makeover for verification and notability. I think it is worth of keeping now... Gidev the Dood ^(Talk) 19:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep Based on coverage by at least two independent analyst firms. HighKing ⁺⁺ 18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.