From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Corey Ellis (artist)

Corey Ellis (artist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. Notability is in doubt. Zazzysa ( talk) 18:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, on the basis he's had a couple of big ticket buyers but his presence is largely on Pinterest and eBay at the moment (he only started out on this career path a couple of years ago). I can only find one, rather flaky local news article about him. Currently fails WP:GNG. Sionk ( talk) 21:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Whether or not an artist sells their artwork, and at what price, has zero direct bearing on their notability and this deletion discussion. If there are significant reliable sources about their selling prices (e.g. the recent Davinci sale) then those can be considered, but not the price on its own. 198.58.171.47 ( talk) 03:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • I don't think anyone's said anything different. By "big ticket" I suppose I mean "big pockets", because we don't know what price they were allegedly sold for (the claim is only sourced to a photo of a boardroom on Wikimedia). I imagine the claim was put in the article to show Ellis is more than an amateur 'Sunday painter', but all the same there's currently negligible evidence he meets WP:NARTIST. Sionk ( talk) 10:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC) reply
I only mentioned it because you gave price as part of the rationale for deletion. "Delete, on the basis he's had a couple of big ticket buyers". You said it. 198.58.171.47 ( talk) 00:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Sources are negligible and do not support either WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. 198.58.171.47 ( talk) 00:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.