From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already draftified. Daniel ( talk) 23:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comikey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Comikey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability, all sources are press releases. Fram ( talk) 16:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While the sources cited are actually not press releases, they both only cover one event. According to the company's website, they were founded in 2020, so other sources (for now) are unlikely to exist. Link20XX ( talk) 19:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
*Keep

I do understand that Anime news network I cited as a reference is a press release as it is under there press release category https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/press-release/recent and I will remove that as a reference, but the crunchyroll link is indeed a secdondary source since it is not underneath there press release category https://www.crunchyroll.com/newsfeed/archive/press-release they also state when an article is a press release underneath the title of each article. as shown bellow

but for the article I listed from chrunchyroll

( https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2021/07/12/comikey-media-licenses-eight-shogakukan-manga-series) Instead the article shows the name of the journalist who wrote the article


Links to the website the screenshots came from: Screenshot 1: https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-press-release/2018/07/21-1/an-inside-look-at-mari-okadas-directorial-debut-maquia-when-the-promised-flower-blooms screenshot 2: https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-press-release/2018/09/25-1/manga-translation-battle-of-professionals-begins Could an editor please review my article again please Side note: There are other reliable sources talking about different events regarding Comikey other than the licensing of the 8 manga I was actually planning on adding the other events after I created the article but I decided to deal with the deletion request first Nuope ( talk)

The Crunchyroll article states at the bottom; "Source: Press release". The writer just seems to have summarized the press release, that's all. Fram ( talk) 07:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The author is using the afore mentioned anime news network article as his source. Crunchyroll will not use any press releases sent to them as sources unless stated so then it will be under the press release category as it is against there policy as another user stated my sources are not press releases however they are using a Press release as their source and according to my knowledge there is nothing against Wikipedia's notability rules that states that you can't use articles that use a press release as source as they are still secondary sources.

Nuope ( talk)

    • While they aren't press releases, I would say they don't meet the WP:CORPDEPTH needed to count to GNG. Link20XX ( talk) 14:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I only used those articles as sources for the partnership category in which case I feel like they do meet the requirements to cite as a reliable source for "partnerships", but if your talking about whether or not the comikey article has received enough coverage to be a wikipedia article that's something different. I could give links to articles that I think(not entirely sure) give it notable coverage as a company as a whole. Nuope

( talk)

    • Please do. If you can find enough sources to make it pass WP:NCORP, per WP:NEXIST the current state of the article is irrelevant. Link20XX ( talk) 16:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply

here are some other articles but looking at them now I doubt they pass WP:CORPDEPTH since there both only talking about one event I do have some other articles that don't cover a specific event of comikey event but there all lists like "best of" or "Top ___" Nuope ( talk)

The second (from sankei.com) definitely is a press release(rather than using it as a source), the first one (media-innovation) reads like one but it's not clear whether it truly is a press release or just some paraphrasing of it. Fram ( talk) 16:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply

The above links are not press releases the link to the press release is here https://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000023.000038982.html https://imgur.com/2JjKdGU(proof that pr times is a press release) I will however remove the sankei link since it is just a direct copy n paste from the orginal pr and is unreliable

Uh, a "direct copy n paste" of a press release, with an indication in the url that it is a press release, and with a box stating that it is a press release and that Sankei is not responsible for the contents, is "not a press release"? Okay... Fram ( talk) 17:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • it's not sankei(there is no indication in the url it is a pr to begin with) like I said just copy and pasted the orginal pr( PR TIMES) hence https://imgur.com/ljNyZzr https://imgur.com/qzxZpdR Saying that the press release does not belong to them(it makes more sense in the orginal japenses google translate butchred a few things) they added links to the original source. it is technically NOT a press release as the definiton: an official statement issued to newspapers giving information on a particular matter. It is like I said a copy and paste with no revision

the topic was not submitted to submitted to them directly. Nuope ( talk)

At this point I would like the article moved to draftspace instead of deletion for the time being also thank you User:Jumpytoo for the suggestion I will try to make a list of all of there licensed series instead. After thinking this through I agree with User:Link20XX that maybe it is to earlier for this particular company to have an article so I'll try to move it to draftspace for now Nuope ( talk)

Draft Link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Comikey (for those that might want to add stuff later)

  • Well since it was draftified by the page creator, can we get this closed? Link20XX ( talk) 23:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as a non-notable company failing WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH with no reliable independent in-depth sources (at least what English search returns and what is listed above). The given sources are not GNG-compatible and are only briefly paraphrasing press releases and official and routine material. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but these sort of companies rarely receive in-depth coverage. —   HELLKNOWZ   ▎ TALK 09:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comikey&oldid=1034982771"