The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom. I actually looked at this one earlier. Just a road junction.
Hog FarmBacon 21:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge into county entry per my post on
Sagrada: there's no reason why a suitably-motivated person wouldn't be capable of finding out more about the place, the GNIS entry and historical records pretty reliably establish that the place does/did exist, obviously not a hoax or contentious in any way -- nobody's going to get misled by this article existing whether it's an article unto itself or a subsection of another page. jp×g 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I think it would probably have been better to
BUNDLE these nominations, since they all proceed from the same general premises, and arguments that are valid for one will be valid similarly for the others. jp×g 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
This is wrong, please see
WP:GNIS for just a few of the many, many examples where the GNIS inaccurately labeled something as "populated place". A populated place is still not automatically a notable community either. There is nothing worth mentioning in the county article about this; what is misleading is undue weight about a road junction or small neighborhood.
Reywas92Talk 22:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the nominator is correct. This does not pass our notability guidelines for
WP:GEOLANDWm335td (
talk) 14:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.