- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. j⚛e decker talk 06:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Cold as Ice (novel)
- Cold as Ice (novel) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable book I+delete+things+alot ( talk) 17:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Book fails WP:GNG. Maybe a redirect to Charles Sheffield would work. wirenote ( talk) 17:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep just like the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ganymede Club, this SF novel received lots of press and a similar work-up can be made as was done for The Ganymede Club. See, for starters, the listing at ISFDB. The book was first published in 1992, has been through several editions and remains in print more than twenty years later. -- Bejnar ( talk) 01:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. The ISFDB page for this novel lists enough reviews to establish the coverage that demonstrates notability. The nom has apparently ignored the requirements of WP:BEFORE and displays a curious interest in deleting the works of a rather notable author. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 23:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 12:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Bejnar. As with the The Ganymede Club AfD, this book appears to have received sufficient independent coverage to meet WP:BK. Gongshow talk 02:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.