From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Cognitive Trust

Cognitive Trust (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same article as Zero Trust Networks with a new name that is not used for this type of thing (cognitive trust is a psychology concept). Original author had the username of ECT, which is a company that "created" the concept of Cognitive Trust (Elisity Cognitive Trust). ... discospinster talk 18:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 18:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: I think this article is pretty blatant advertising, created by a single purpose account. It would have to be completely rewritted to be encyclopedic. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep while the concept was created by Elisity, it is still a very relevant concept in the cyber-security world, and is being implemented by leading organizations across the globe. It will be recognized by several reputable organizations (like gartner) in the near future, and does in fact enhance the capabilities of the traditional zero trust architecture. The article is being edited to be more encyclopedic now, and less promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:280:4600:55D0:A440:55F5:4A39:C85C ( talk) 00:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Apparently this is essentially a variant of Zero Trust Networks, and not appropriate for a separate article. DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.