The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable software product lacking GHits of substance and lack any GNEWS. Appears to fail
WP:PRODUCT and
WP:COMPANY.
ttonyb1 (
talk) 15:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Speedy removed by IP which should not be allowed IMHO.
Jujutaculartalkcontribs 15:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, A7. Removing a speedy template normally calls for an edit summary at least, especially from an IP. Sorry, speedy decline rationale on talk page, although at no point in the edit summary does it say "speedy declined", which is poor form at best. Delete at whatever speed, not notable.
Hairhorn (
talk) 15:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, non-notable. --
GreyCat (
talk) 18:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.