The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability and it seems to be entirely non-notable.
Schuym1 (
talk) 03:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep as its the only FF extension I know of that exposes the LINK element in the UI, and quite comprehensively too. Support for this feature has historically been poor in browsers for a very long time despite LINK being part of HTML since 1995.
[1] This support makes the subject notable. ⇔ ChristTrekker 03:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)reply
That doesn't show notability per the guidelines and policies.
Schuym1 (
talk) 03:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The article was nominated within hours of its creation. Maybe it could be
given a fair chance for editors to add references. ⇔ ChristTrekker 15:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete insufficient reliable sources to demonstrate notability per
WP:GNG.
Icewedge (
talk) 04:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 01:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 13:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Article has now had time for notability to be established, and this hasn't been done. Does not meet guidelines for inclusion, fails
notability criteria, and thus should be deleted. Even if it is the only product that does a certain thing a certain way, if the notability cannot be established according to Wikipedia guidelines, the article should be deleted. A
fair chance has been provided, and the article still fails the criteria, so delete.
Theseeker4 (
talk) 15:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.