The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Struck duplicate !vote from the nominator above; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America1000 08:58, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: I was able to find the following sources, though only a few are substantial:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7]. Anarchyte (
work |
talk) 04:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge with
Vandalism on Wikipedia into the fighting vandalism page. The sources are borderline, and this seems like something that could be better covered under the larger topic.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 17:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The coverage is borderline. Perhaps it would be better to say I was agreeing with
Anarchyte's analysis of the sourcing, but that I think instead of keeping as a separate article, where there is a weak argument for it by GNG, that there is a very strong argument for expanding or improving the coverage at the linked article, and redirecting the bot article to it.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 19:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
FWIW, I'd also support closing as Redirect and merge from history per below. I typically prefer that as a close, but do think there might be content worth merging here, which is why I had that as my bold !vote.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 00:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect. It's definitely a plausible search term;
Vandalism on Wikipedia seems fine as a target. Simply being name-dropped in publicity pieces is not sufficient for notability; a link to
User:ClueBot NG on
Vandalism on Wikipedia is probably all the coverage necessary on that page if the references aren't useful there.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 01:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.