The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 00:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)reply
After the author put this up several times without any sources (and was reverted), I
left them a message about sourcing requirements. My own search check didn't look promising, but I thought they might have access to better stuff. Guess not: every reference provided is either self-published or purely promotional. That includes the two most reasonable-looking ones
[1][2], both of which are clearly identified as marketing features. - Currently lack of sufficient independent coverage, fails
WP:NSOFT. - Admittedly the previous incumbent (misspelling redirect to
Cluedo) is kind of dumb, but this is not the material to replace it. --Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 16:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 16:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment Have removed the promotional and unencyclopedic material (
previous version). I could not see that their use of "machine learning" was particularly notable. I can't find a single impartial source talking about them in depth, I couldn't even find an impartial mention of them on technical discussion forums. – Þjarkur(talk) 18:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'd suggest people trying to improve and save the article and save this read
WP:THREE. Thankyou.
Djm-leighpark (
talk) 13:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.